Which of the following is NOT a type of common site implementation?

Which of the following is NOT a type of common site implementation?

• A. Warm site
• B. Cold site
• C. Advanced site
• D. Hot site

Answer: (C)

The correct answer is "Advanced site" because it is not recognized as a standard category for site implementation in disaster recovery and business continuity planning. The terms "warm site," "cold site," and "hot site" are commonly used classifications that describe different levels of preparedness and readiness for backup operations following a disaster. A warm site typically offers a compromise between a hot site and a cold site, providing some resources and infrastructure that can be ready to use after a short period. A cold site is more of a basic facility that does not have the technological equipment fully deployed and requires more setup time to become operational. In contrast, a hot site has all the necessary hardware and software in place, allowing for immediate failover to continue operations with minimal downtime. Since "Advanced site" does not fit within these established categories, it stands out as the option that does not represent a recognized type of site implementation. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for effectively planning for disaster recovery scenarios.

The correct answer is "Advanced site" because it is not recognized as a standard category for site implementation in disaster recovery and business continuity planning. The terms "warm site," "cold site," and "hot site" are commonly used classifications that describe different levels of preparedness and readiness for backup operations following a disaster.

A warm site typically offers a compromise between a hot site and a cold site, providing some resources and infrastructure that can be ready to use after a short period. A cold site is more of a basic facility that does not have the technological equipment fully deployed and requires more setup time to become operational. In contrast, a hot site has all the necessary hardware and software in place, allowing for immediate failover to continue operations with minimal downtime.

Since "Advanced site" does not fit within these established categories, it stands out as the option that does not represent a recognized type of site implementation. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for effectively planning for disaster recovery scenarios.